Samsung z fold vs iphone 13 pro max

Here you can compare Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (1TB) and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4. Comparing Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (1TB) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (1TB) stands against Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (1TB) is ₹1,79,900 and for Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 is ₹1,54,998. The details of both of these products were last updated on Nov 28, 2022.

SpecificationApple iPhone 13 Pro Max (1TB)Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4
Rear Camera 12 MP f/1.5 (Wide Angle)
12 MP f/1.8 (Ultra Wide)
12 MP f/2.8 (Telephoto) with autofocus
50 MP f/1.8 (Wide Angle)
10 MP f/2.4 (Telephoto)
12 MP f/2.2 (Ultra Wide) with autofocus
Battery 4352 mAh, Li-ion Battery 4400 mAh, Li-Po Battery
OS iOS v15 Android v12
Display 6.7 inches, 1284 x 2778 pixels, 120 Hz 7.6 inches, 1812 x 2176 pixels, 120 Hz
Internal Memory 1 TB 256 GB
Price ₹1,79,900 ₹1,54,998

Samsung z fold vs iphone 13 pro max

VS

Samsung z fold vs iphone 13 pro max

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 7.6-inch Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 5G (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G) that was released on August 11, 2021, against the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, which is powered by Apple A15 Bionic and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone

Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 5G

  • Has a 0.9 inch larger screen size
  • Has 2x more RAM: 12GB versus 6GB
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5 2750 MHz
  • Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus NVMe
  • Reverse charging feature
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)

Reasons to consider the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

  • Shows 83% longer battery life (43:44 vs 23:53 hours)
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Apple releases software updates and supports their phones a few years longer than Samsung
  • Delivers 13% higher peak brightness (1051 against 930 nits)
  • 22% higher pixel density (458 vs 374 PPI)
  • Better grip in hands – the body is 50 mm narrower

Review

Display

Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness

Performance

CPU/GPU performance in apps and games

Battery

Battery life, charging type and speed

Camera

Photo and video recording quality

Connectivity

Networks, ports, data transmission

NanoReview score

Final comparison evaluation

Value for money

You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money.

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED OLED
Size 7.6 inches 6.7 inches
Resolution 1768 x 2208 pixels 1284 x 2778 pixels
Aspect ratio 22.5:18 19.5:9
PPI 374 ppi 458 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Max rated brightness 500 nits 1000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1200 nits 1200 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, Dolby Vision
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus Ceramic Shield
Screen-to-body ratio 88.8% 87.4%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space 97.3% 99.9%
PWM 245 Hz 238 Hz
Response time 6.4 ms 8.5 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity

Peak brightness test (auto)

Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 158.2 mm (6.23 inches) 160.8 mm (6.33 inches)
Width 128.1 mm (5.04 inches) 78.1 mm (3.07 inches)
Thickness 6.4 mm (0.25 inches) 7.65 mm (0.3 inches)
Weight 271 gramm (9.56 oz) 240 gramm (8.47 oz)
Waterproof IPX8 IP68
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver, Green Black, Silver, Gold, Blue, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in home button No

Performance

Tests of Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 5G and Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max in the benchmarks

SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G Apple A15 Bionic
Max. clock 2840 MHz 3200 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 6 (2 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
- 3 cores at 2.42 GHz: Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
- 1 core at 2.84 GHz: Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
- 4 cores at 2.02 GHz: Blizzard
- 2 cores at 3.24 GHz: Avalanche
L3 cache 4 MB -
Lithography process 5 nanometers 5 nanometers
Graphics Adreno 660 Apple GPU
GPU clock 840 MHz 1200 MHz
FLOPS ~1720 GFLOPS -
Memory
RAM size 12 GB 6 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2750 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage size 256, 512 GB 128, 256, 512, 1024 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 NVMe
Memory card No No

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

CPU 207270 213823
GPU 272918 317561
Memory 144935 126792
UX 151113 136444
Total score 782285 799752

3DMark Wild Life Performance

Stability 63% 82%
Graphics test 32 FPS 56 FPS
Graphics score 5358 9483
PCMark 3.0 score 13502 -

Software

Operating system Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 13) iOS 15 (Can be upgraded to iOS 16.1.1)
ROM One UI 5.0 -
OS size 39 GB 13 GB

Battery

Specifications
Capacity 4400 mAh 4352 mAh
Charge power 25 W 27 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (10 W) Yes (7.5 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) No
Fast charging Yes (33% in 30 min) Yes (42% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:46 hr 1:46 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 07:38 hr 14:55 hr
Watching video 11:50 hr 20:14 hr
Gaming 04:51 hr 07:42 hr
Standby 75 hr 140 hr

Camera

Specs and camera test of smartphones

Main camera
Matrix 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Image resolution 4000 x 3000 4032 x 3024
Zoom Optical, 2x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 123° 120°
Lenses 3 (12 MP + 12 MP + 12 MP) 4 (12 MP + 12 MP + 12 MP + 0 MP)
Wide (main) lens - 12 MP
- Aperture: f/1.8
- Focal length: 26 mm
- Pixel size: 1.8 micron
- Sensor: 1/1.76", Sony IMX555 (Exmor-RS CMOS)
- Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
- Optical stabilization
- 12 MP
- Aperture: f/1.5
- Focal length: 26 mm
- Pixel size: 1.9 micron
- Sensor: 1/1.66", Sony IMX703 (Exmor-RS CMOS)
- Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
- Optical stabilization
Telephoto lens - 12 MP
- Aperture: f/2.4
- Focal length: 52 mm
- Pixel size: 1 micron
- Sensor: 1/3.6", SK Hynix Hi-1337 (CMOS)
- Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
- Optical stabilization
- 12 MP
- Aperture: f/2.8
- Focal length: 77 mm
- Pixel size: 1 micron
- Phase autofocus
- Optical stabilization
Ultra-wide lens - 12 MP
- Aperture: f/2.2
- Pixel size: 1.12 micron
- Sensor: 1/3.06", Sony IMX258 (Exmor-RS CMOS)
- 12 MP
- Aperture: f/1.8
- Focal length: 13 mm
- Pixel size: 1 micron
- Phase autofocus
Depth lens - - Pixel size: 1 micron
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 5G from DxOMark Photo samples of Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max from DxOMark
Selfie camera
Megapixels 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Image resolution 3648 x 2736 4032 x 3024
Aperture f/1.8 f/2.2
Focal length - 23 mm
Pixel size 2 microns 1 microns
Sensor type CMOS Exmor-RS CMOS
Sensor size - 1/3.6"
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS

DxOMark camera tests

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5
Bluetooth features PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP LE, A2DP
USB type USB Type-C -
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 1 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 20 18
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced August 2021 September 2021
Release date August 2021 September 2021
SAR (head) - 0.99 W/kg
SAR (body) - 0.98 W/kg
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor

*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 5G

209 (60.6%)

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

136 (39.4%)

Total votes: 345

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below

Is Samsung Z fold better than iPhone 13?

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 vs iPhone 13 Pro Max: Overall winner The Galaxy Z Fold 4 shows up the iPhone 13 Pro Max when it comes to multitasking, productivity and display quality.

Which is better iPhone 13 Pro Max or Z fold 3?

Overall winner: iPhone 13 Pro Max While it certainly isn't the most novel phone in this head-to-head, the iPhone 13 Pro Max is definitely the best overall. Its superior battery, increased memory, more versatile cameras, and more reliable software support make it a better device than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3.

Is iPhone 13 Pro better than Samsung?

The iPhone 13 Pro beats the Galaxy S22 Plus in the performance, video performance, and battery departments. However, the Galaxy S22 Plus has a bigger, better display and faster charging speed. The camera performance and software are a close call.

Is iPhone 13 better than Samsung Galaxy?

On the Geekbench 5 overall performance test, the iPhone 13 delivered an impressive 4,436, only coming in behind its Pro siblings. The Galaxy S22 comes in roughly 1,100 points behind at 3,341.